The Trudeau Government and Its Global Agendas and What It Means for Canadians’ National Interests

Since the day they took office in 2015, the Trudeau Liberals have been implementing multiple global agendas in our country. Justin Trudeau claimed Canada would be the world’s first post-national state and his government’s record reflects this ignominious desire that has come at the expense of Canadians’ national interests.

Trudeau and lead ministers such as Chrystia Freeland and Steven Guilbeault are unabashed champions of projects and policy initiatives being advanced by the World Economic Forum (WEF), United Nations (UN), and World Health Organization (WHO). They have been forthright about the government’s commitment to (although less than transparent about its participation in) Agenda 2030, the UN’s migration treaty, and the WHO Pandemic Treaty, to name just a few. This unwavering commitment towards implementing post-national global agendas is a definitive hallmark of the Trudeau government.

Today, in Ottawa, there is a growing army of bureaucrats and diplomats who are tasked to establish policy objectives and manage the programs of the WEF, UN, and WHO within Canada. In recent years this army has also become increasingly active in promoting the global agendas of these international bodies around the world. Much of this activity goes unnoticed by Canadians.

In a series of articles through June, By George Journal will explore the details of the global agendas currently in play at the WEF, UN, and WHO. My editorial mission is to address the potential impact the global agendas are having on Canadians’ national interests. It is hoped that by providing detailed background and connecting the dots Canadians will have the necessary information to determine for themselves whether the country’s full participation in the agenda of the UN, WHO, and WEF is desirable.

For the By George Journal paid subscribers, I look forward to sharing my research sources and engaging your input on core questions concerning the Trudeau Liberals’ post-national designs for the country. For me, I have approached this “global agendas vs national interests” series as an existential question about the Canadian “Nation” and what the country has – what remains of a Canadian dream – to fight for. And, I suppose I will add, whether Canadians have any interest to fight for it. I look forward to the discussion.