This is the third column of three in the By George Redux series, introducing the conflicts between Canadians’ national interests and global agendas as defined by the World Economic Forum (WEF), United Nations (UN), and the World Health Organization (WHO).
Links to the previous columns are here: The WEF and The WHO.
The United Nations was established towards the end of World War II with the hope that an international body dedicated to peace and security would ensure there would never again be a global conflict with such massive destruction and loss of life as witnessed in the 1940’s. In the seven decades since, the UN has grown in reach to include 193 nations, in scope to debate matters from justice to economic issues, and in size to administer $67 billion for 43 UN entities.
Canada is the eighth largest financial contributor to the UN, behind most G7 nations but ahead of countries such as Australia, India, and Russia. The United States financially supports 22 per cent of the UN budget, and China provides 15 per cent. Apart from these two superpowers, Canada punches above its weight flushing taxpayers’ money into UN coffers – and many Canadians have not a clue where this money is going. Matthew Horwood and Omid Ghoreishi have just published an investigative research piece in the Epoch Times that is eye-opening (a must-read for those with a subscription): What is Canada’s Annual $16 Billion in Foreign Aid Being Spent On?
Canada is fully committed to the UN global agendas and the Canadian government has seldom questioned the UN’s activities, even when the agency is in conflict with Canadian values and the country’s interests. In the past year, this fact has been highlighted in the debate over the UN’s Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA). The Trudeau government continues to support and financially pay into this organization, though it has been documented that it has staff who were active participants in the horrors of October 7th. It is also suspected that the millions of dollars that have been funneled into Palestine through the UNRWA over the past few years have actually been supporting the Hamas and their military goals.
When the UNRWA’s ties to Hamas were exposed and widely criticized, the Trudeau government publicly stated they were halting funding, yet privately Canada actually committed to maintaining its financial support. This bald deception was not debated as ministers refused to discuss the matter and the government-sponsored legacy media has gone out of its way to sidestep the questions relating to the financial support of Hamas (and the pro-Hamas demonstrations on our city streets and campuses).
Canadians hear very little of the UN and it activities – until recently. Sharp criticisms of the UN have been brought into focus by MP Leslyn Lewis who sponsored a petition in the House of Commons in early 2024 that calls on Canada to withdraw from the UN’s programs as enlisted in Agenda 2030. The petition cites concerns for national sovereignty and the “sweeping impact” the interests of global bodies and unelected private entities will have on Canadians’ public and private lives.
Globalists supportive of the UN’s Agenda 2030 have framed MP Lewis’s efforts to raise awareness on the initiatives as some type of misinformation campaign of the “far-right.” Liberal and NDP MPs mock Lewis’s concerns and have silenced the debate by labelling any discussion of the UN’s program as “tinfoil cap” conspiratorial.
However, the fact is the UN Agenda 2030 is a wide-ranging document pronouncing international goals that include everything from eradicating poverty to addressing climate change, to coordinating the development and global distribution of vaccines and medications. With such a comprehensive set of global objectives, does it not warrant a review and debate? Verily, the devil is in the details. In a future article, By George Journal will look at the 17 articles of Agenda 2030 and what they may mean for Canadians, as well as report on the concerns of MP Lewis and the more than 90,000 Canadians who signed her petition.
Future columns on Canada and the UN will also raise facts relating to the country’s involvement with the UN’s plans for climate change and it’s designs for managing migration, particularly from third world nations to willing host western countries like Canada. By George Journal will also report on the strategic working relationship between the UN and the World Economic Forum.
By George Journal readers can expect two key editorial questions in this series:
What impact will the full scope of global initiatives have on the sovereign nation of Canada and its citizens?
What will it mean for Canadians when the federal government is signatory and adhering to the directives, policies and treaties of the WEF, UN and WHO?
For paid subscribers, I will provide additional editorial comment, archived columns and research sources.
As Canadians learned from the recent news revealed about UNRWA and the disturbing protest scenes on our streets and campuses, it is essential that the facts be acknowledged concerning the UN agendas and how they are being played out in coordination with the WEF and WHO. Canadians should be more aware of this global design and have the opportunity to debate whether we want to be a part of it.
Let me briefly comment on the questions that need to be asked regarding Canada’s unqualified support for the United Nations, its agencies and its agendas….